I thought it was interesting that both Chaudhury and Tye
addressed the relationship between dopamine and depression-related behaviors in
the VTA using optigenetics, but found such conflicting results. The main
experimental difference between the two papers was Chaudhury’s use of the
social defeat paradigm that induces severe stress, while Tye used a mild
chronic stress paradigm to induce depressive-like behavior. Chaudhury found
that VTA dopamine neurons firing to the nucleus accumbens induces a depressive
phenotype via social defeat stress; however, Tye found that increased firing of
VTA dopamine neurons reverses chronic mild stress. This demonstrates that
different stressors may cause opposite response from VTA pathways. It is
interesting to extend these findings to the potential therapeutic value in
application to humans; could varying degrees of stress activate opposing
pathways in the VTA in humans? Furthermore, once our understanding of mental
illness and depression has expanded, could antidepressants eventually be
designed to treat a specific type of stress depending on its severity?
Additionally, I thought it was noteworthy that both papers acknowledged that
stress and depression can induce opposite pathways, despite both papers being
published in the same year and volume.
While I generally found that the experiments were well
designed in both papers, there were a couple experimental procedures that
raised a few questions. As a few of my peers mentioned, the Chaudhury paper
employed a social defeat paradigm for only ten days, while Tye et. al used a
chronic stress paradigm to induce depressive-like symptoms for eight to ten
weeks. Was this extreme difference in time length for administering stress
paradigms due to the difference in severity between the two stress models?
Furthermore, is ten days sufficient to induce a depressive state, even if using
a severe form of stress? Regardless, Tye’s approach seems more valid as an
inducer of a depressive-like state, as antidepressants take as long as six to
eight weeks to begin to relieve symptoms. Additionally, Chaudhury only employed
two measures to confirm mice were indeed experiencing a depressive-like state: the
sucrose preference test and social interaction test. Tye employed more measures
of depression: a forced swim test, tail-suspension test and sucrose preference,
which I believe adds increased validity to their findings.
No comments:
Post a Comment