Optogenetics involves the control
of specific neuronal populations through light waves and is a novel technology
that can be used to directly study certain neurotransmitter pathways. The model
of depression has long been studying the effects of dopamine on depression and
depressive behaviors. The role of this circuit was looked at in the two papers
discussing phasic and tonic firing of VTA dopamine neurons as a contributor in elevating
depressive symptoms or causing susceptibility towards them.
In the
first paper, Tye et al find that through the CMS model of depressive behaviors
that a phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons alleviates the depressive symptoms
quickly and that this effect also requires functioning DA receptors in the NAc.
Their alternative finding was that inhibiting these same neurons induced a depressive
behavior state. These results would lead one to believe that the firing of DA
neurons in the VTA plays an important role in depression. I appreciated that Tye
et al included a locomotion control test in order to assess whether CMS or
induced inhibition of VTA DA neurons reduced general locomotion. This control
showed that these systems were not being affected through their experimental
manipulations of DA signaling and thus stood to strengthen the findings that
CMS and induced inhibition of VTA DA neurons caused a reduction of struggle
behavior associated with a tail suspension test. Even with these measures, Tye et al admit to the
fact that their findings should be looked at as a beginning for understanding
how the DA circuit mediates these effects. This is because depression is a
complex illness and that it is not fully clear what downstream target the VTA
has that is changing the depression related behaviors.
Chaundry et
al had very different findings regarding the stimulation of DA neurons in the
VTA. They found through their social-defeat stress model of depression that
phasic firing of the DA neurons in the VTA actually lead to depressive related
behaviors being induced. This finding was backed up by looking at the VTA
projections to the NAc and the mPFC in order to see if the depressive susceptibility
needed either brain area to mediate its effects. It was seen to be true that the
phasic activation of the NAc from DA neuron projections was the area that
mediated such effects.
Since both
papers looked at the phasic firing of the DA neurons in the VTA but found
almost opposite effects then the differences must come down to the stress
paradigms in which each experiment was run. The CMS model is seen as causing
low levels of stress in comparison to the higher stress of the social-defeat
model. Both methods affect the brains normal bursting activity and it is
through this alteration that both groups of researchers believe depressive
behaviors are being mediated. The CMS
low stress model showed that phasic firing of the VTA relieved depressive
related behaviors while the social-defeat high stress model showed that the
phasic firing of the VTA caused depressive related behaviors. It is possible (and
likely) that both are true and that the levels of stress play a role in the
determination of depressive related behaviors and that firing patterns in the
VTA will cause their seen effects based on this stressor. Knowing of both
pieces of research can lead to another study that looks at the effects of
differing stress paradigms and phasic firing of the VTA on depression.
No comments:
Post a Comment