Before starting to read both articles, I wanted to gather
the information I already learned about the mechanisms of using antidepressants
to treat depression. For starters, I understood that depression can be caused
by a chemical imbalance of serotonin and/or norepinephrine (which I later came
to learn is the monoaminergic hypothesis of depression). Antidepressants are then
used to either provide the missing neurotransmitters or to block the reuptake
of the already present neurotransmitters. Now ready to read the two articles of
the week, I wanted to learn exactly how antidepressants work to effectively
treat depression symptoms?
In the Santarelli et
al. article, they suggested that antidepressants relieve depression
symptoms by having an exclusive relationship with neurogenesis in the
hippocampus. Where I want to believe the simple explanation of depression being
treated with the development of new neurons, I found it hard to follow the
execution of the study. First, they used mice that did not have any previous
symptoms of depression and inflicted a series of stress-inducing tests on them.
Are stress and depression the same thing in this model? Second, if stress
causes atrophy of neurons in the hippocampus and antidepressants work only if
neurogenesis is present, does this mean that there is no way of salvaging
already present mature neurons? Do new neurons constantly have to be produced
in order to replace damaged neurons that no longer work? Are the new neurons
produced using antidepressants the same as the neurons already present? I believe
this article’s hypothesis could have been made stronger if it addressed some of
these questions or clarified, in more detail, their tracking of the
neurogenesis. The Bessa et al.
article provided not only some answers to my questions but also a more
reasonable hypothesis to how antidepressants work. They used mice that were
already introduced to a chronic mild stress paradigm before being tested with
multiple stress tests. Their hypothesis that antidepressants work to repair
damaged neurons was a realistic theory because it provided scientific proof of
NCAM1 expression to back it up. Although
neurogenesis does increase in the presence of antidepressants, is it the sole
mechanism to how antidepressants treat depression? I believe the brain is very
complex and one simple explanation to a disease doesn’t seem like the likely
answer. More research must be done in order to understand the disease and its
mechanism.
No comments:
Post a Comment