The question in the Kellendonk paper asks what the behavioral
and physiological consequences of increased D2 receptor function is in the
rodent striatum. However, based on previous research, we already basically know
what will happen when we increase D2R function in the rodent striatum – what we
really want to know from this paper is how doing this will fit into the various
hypotheses regarding the origin of DA dysfunction and its consequences in the
schizophrenic brain.
While most of the paper was spent proving that the outcome
of the manipulations on D2 transgenic mice worked/was what they expected it to
be, the important findings (in my opinion) were that the cognitive deficits
were not reversible along with D2 receptor hyperfunction in the striatum, plus
the incurrence of compensation in mPFC D1 receptor function. Results suggest bidirectionality
in the system and offer two possible explanations for the homeostatic mechanism
apparent between D2 receptors in the subcortex and cortical D1.
This paper is awesome for paving the way for future study,
but I do disagree with the last line; I don’t think that we can extrapolate
from these results that this study has achieved confirmation of causality (ie,
that D2 receptor gene polymorphism causes D2R dysfunction which causes D1R
compensation).
The Moore paper is more extensive as a model of
schizophrenia than the Kellendonk paper, but each has problems – in this model,
all pathology “boxes” are checked, but the mechanism of MAM methylation on E17
is not explored. Testing what developmental processes occur on that day shouldn’t
be hard in a rodent model. But that seems to me the right next step for this
research.
This model tackles the DA problem at an interesting angle
(hyperresponse to psychoactive drugs) but is naïve to the subtleties of the DA
receptor balance that the Kellendonk paper examined. The Moore model doesn’t
rule out the validity of the Kellendonk model, especially when considering the
possibility that a DAR polymorphism is responsible for DAR dysfunction –
perhaps this is a development on E17?
No comments:
Post a Comment