The 2008 Herry et al paper was our first look at extinction
in relation to the fear circuitry and optogenetic manipulations that we had
seen up to this point. The goal of the paper was to show that two distinct
populations of neurons, extinction and fear, are at work regulating the
response to conditioned stimuli during fear paradigms.
I thought
that the experimental design was lacking at times as they made broad claims and
backed up with little evidence. The first fault I had was with their explanation
that these fear and extinction neurons were two totally separate neuronal populations.
The questions they posed was a good one, whether individual extinction neurons
can function as fear neurons later with a different CS perhaps. The problem was
when “demonstrating” that this was not the case and they are in fact two separate
classes of neurons, all they showed was a classic fear paradigm. In the example,
it stated that extinction neurons responded to the extinguished CS but not the unextinguished
CS (obviously) and that the fear neurons responded to the unextinguished CS and
not the extinguished CS (also obviously). This does not prove their point that
these two neurons cannot later become a extinction neuron or fear neuron after
having played the other role prior. This is later remedied a little with their
physiological data showing that the two different types of neurons do have some
distinct differences. This helped the validity of their assertions much more
than their designed experiment made it seem. After these facts, and a few other
procedural mishaps such as using multiple contexts to condition and extinguish fears,
the paper made a valid case for microarchitecture of these cells providing a switch
of behavior when confronting fear stimuli.
The second
paper from Courtin et al was much more thorough in its language and figures
providing data for their identification of subpopulations of neurons from type
2 INs the PVINs. These figures made this paper easier to follow and the story
came across more convincingly. The synchronicity of the neurons firing being
the defining feature of information encoding makes it a prime target to explore
when attempting to find see behavioral expression come from neuronal circuits.
Their findings that synchronization of neurons could elicit a sustained fear
response and that resetting to the optimal firing relationship could be used as
a sort of therapy was exciting.
No comments:
Post a Comment